InVideo vs Revid
InVideo's entry plan costs $17 per month billed annually and Revid's entry plan costs $39 per month, measured directly from each pricing page on 23 August
Last checked
InVideo's entry plan costs $17 per month billed annually and Revid's entry plan costs $39 per month, measured directly from each pricing page on 23 August 2026. The deeper difference is in footage: InVideo draws on generation plus a stock library, while Revid generates its visuals.
Choose InVideo if you want broad general-purpose video generation from a prompt, with stock footage mixed into generated output.
Choose Revid if your goal is high-volume short-form output where every visual is generated.
Choose neither if you need real archive footage or a source citation for every clip.
What each one does
InVideo is built for broad general-purpose generation from a prompt. You describe what you want, it produces a video drawing on both AI generation and a stock library. It is not scoped to one format or workflow; it covers a wide range of prompt-to-video jobs. Its pricing page lists three tiers: Plus at $17 per month equivalent ($200 billed yearly, 75 credits), Max at $85 per month equivalent ($1,000 billed yearly, 390 credits), and Elite at $900 per month equivalent ($10,800 billed yearly, 4,250 credits). Watermark-free output is available on paid plans.
Revid is built for high-volume short-form output with generated visuals. The entry Hobby plan costs $39 per month. A Growth tier is listed at $99 with the price struck through to $39 per month, tied to 2,000 AI credits per month. The page carries a monthly/yearly toggle, and the figures read here are the monthly state. Like InVideo, it does not name sources for individual clips.
Side by side
| InVideo | Revid | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Broad general-purpose generation from a prompt | High-volume short-form output with generated visuals |
| Footage source | Generation and stock | Generated |
| Names sources per clip | No | No |
| Starts at | $17/month (annual billing) | $39/month |
Where InVideo wins
- One-off varied projects. If this month's job is a product explainer and next month's is a social ad, a general-purpose prompt-to-video tool with a stock library handles both without switching products.
- Lower entry cost. At $17 per month on annual billing against Revid's $39, the first paid step costs less than half as much.
- Stock fallback. When generation produces something unusable, a stock library gives you an alternative shot without leaving the tool.
Where Revid wins
- Volume focus. Revid is designed around producing many short videos rather than one-off long-form pieces. If your workflow is publishing short-form content daily or several times a week, a tool scoped to that job removes the friction of repurposing a general editor. The Growth tier's 2,000 AI credits per month are sized for sustained output, not occasional renders.
- Short-form defaults. Because every part of the product assumes vertical short-form output, you spend less time configuring aspect ratios, pacing, and caption behavior that a general-purpose tool treats as settings to adjust. For teams whose entire output is shorts, those defaults compound across hundreds of videos.
- Simpler decision surface. With fewer tiers and a single clear use case, choosing a plan takes minutes. InVideo's three tiers span $17 to $900 per month equivalent, which suits agencies but can be more structure than a solo creator needs.
If neither fits
If you need editing control over footage you already have, Descript offers editing around a recording with the most control, starting at $24 per month on annual billing.
If you want vertical documentaries about real events built from real archive footage, with a media credit file naming the source of every clip, ViewMade does that starting at $29 per month for 50 renders.
<!-- faq -->Frequently asked questions
Is InVideo better than Revid?
Neither is better overall. InVideo covers broader prompt-to-video work and starts cheaper at $17 per month on annual billing. Revid is scoped to high-volume short-form output and starts at $39 per month. Pick by whether your work is varied or volume-driven.
Which one uses real archive footage?
Neither. InVideo combines generation with a stock library, and Revid generates its visuals. Both were measured in August 2026 as not naming sources per clip.
How much do they cost?
Measured on 23 August 2026: InVideo starts at $17 per month equivalent on annual billing, rising to $85 and then $900 per month equivalent. Revid starts at $39 per month, with a Growth tier listed at $99 struck through to $39 per month.
Do either of them cite their footage sources?
No. Neither product provides a per-clip source citation. If attribution matters for your channel, that is a gap in both.
Can I try them free?
Opus Clip has a free tier, but no free tier was measured for either InVideo or Revid on their pricing pages as of 23 August 2026.